Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): >> I pulled all the recent patches in linux-cr (except for ipv6 fixup >> set), and created the following two branches: >> >> ckpt-v20-dev - patches applied onto pof v20 >> ckpt-v21-rc1 - patches folded into a clean patchset >> >> Likewise with user-cr (but with more exceptions - working now on >> pulling more patches in). >> >> This is totally untested except for successful compilation... >> >> Oren. > > v21 with the recent patches applied seems rock-solid to me, on > x86-64, s390x, and powerpc. > > recent patches means: > skip down interfaces v2, > put fops->checkpoint under ifdef > get rid of ckpt_hdr_vpids, > export net checkpoint fns > > for kernel and > > Add --nonetns switch to user-cr checkpoint > fix vpids > user-c/r: get rid of ckpt_hdr_vpids > > to user-cr#ckpt-v20-dev I pushed linux-cr:ckpt-v21-rc2 with: > skip down interfaces v2, > put fops->checkpoint under ifdef > get rid of ckpt_hdr_vpids, > export net checkpoint fns and user-cr:ckpt-v20-dev with: > fix vpids > user-c/r: get rid of ckpt_hdr_vpids plus Suka's two recent patches. Dan's --nonetns is pending - see my reply. > > Do we want to try and incorporate Matt's patchset to clear out > linux-2.6/checkpoint/ next, or ship what we have? IIRC there is at least one more comment from fsdevel that I need to address, need to dig into emails again (file_pos_ ?). I hope to start tackling the transformation to matt's-format by tomorrow, and will see how fast it goes. Oren. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
