On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Andrea Righi wrote: > > Hmm...do we need spinlock ? You use "unsigned long", then, read-write > > is always atomic if not read-modify-write. > > I think I simply copy&paste the memcg->swappiness case. But I agree, > read-write should be atomic. > We don't need memcg->reclaim_param_lock in get_swappiness() or mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_priority(). _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
