On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:22:42AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: [..] > > +static int mem_cgroup_dirty_bytes_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, > > + u64 val) > > +{ > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp); > > + struct mem_cgroup *parent; > > + > > + if (cgrp->parent == NULL) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp->parent); > > + > > + cgroup_lock(); > > + > > + /* If under hierarchy, only empty-root can set this value */ > > + if ((parent->use_hierarchy) || > > + (memcg->use_hierarchy && !list_empty(&cgrp->children))) { > > + cgroup_unlock(); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > Okay, then, only hierarchy root can set the value. > Please descirbe this kind of important things in patch description. > Hi Andrea, Why can only root of the hierarchy set set dirty_bytes value? In this case, a child cgroup's amount of dirty pages will be controlled by dirty_ratio? Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers