Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be > > mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup > > is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote > > for it as +1 for /cgroup. > > /dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does > deal with actual devices. cgroups do not. Hmm, on whose behalf are you making this decision? LSB people will want to avoid using /cgroup, but I think a lot of admins will likely prefer /cgroup (as I do). On my systems I always use /cgroup, but would be more likely to use /mnt/cgroup over /dev/cgroup. lxc (at lxc.sf.net) rightfully takes the cgroupfs from wherever it happens to be mounted. Do you really need a mountpoint decided? If you do, then while I DETEST the extra typing, I think /sys/kernel/cgroup makes most sense, since that's where you find debugfs and securityfs. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
