On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be > mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup > is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote > for it as +1 for /cgroup. /dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does deal with actual devices. cgroups do not. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
