Eric W. Biederman [ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
| +static int set_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, int target)
| +{
| + if (target >= pid_max)
| + return -1;
I am changing this and the next return to 'return -EINVAL', to match
an earlier patch in my patchset.
| + if (target < RESERVED_PIDS)
Should we replace RESERVED_PIDS with 0 ? We currently allow new
containers to have pids 1..32K in the first pass and in subsequent
passes assign starting at RESERVED_PIDS.
Sukadev
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
