Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Eric W. Biederman [ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > | Not what I was thinking. The following untested patch is what I was > | thinking. It just exposes last, min, and max to the callers which pass > | in different appropriate values. > > > Minor comments are that the caller has to choose which function to call > and passing in 'target-1' for the 'last' in set_pidmap() seems a bit > unnatural. But I can't think of a better way and I think this will work. > Will test it out. Thanks. My primary concern was that we don't unnecessarily duplicate all of the weird allocating a bitmap page code etc. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
