On 10/05, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov [oleg@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > | Sorry for confusion. > | > | > But sure, we could use force_sig_info() in caller. > | > | Yes, because this makes the code more explicit imho. And we can avoid > | the further complicatiions in send_signal() path. > > Although, one small drawback would be the different behavior for the > SIGKILL in load_aout_binary() to the container-init itself calling: > > kill(getpid(), SIGKILL); could you clarify? load_aout_binary(), like other ->load_binary() methods does send_sig(SIGKILL, current, 0) ? And thanks for review. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
