On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:58:12 -0700
Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Revert commit 8827c288feb7810185aa7c2e37537202fc709869
>
> This is in preparation for some clashing cgroups changes that subsume
> the original commit's functionaliy.
Please don't refer to commits via their bare hash number.
This commit actually has a different hash in my tree:
commit 096b7fe012d66ed55e98bc8022405ede0cc80e96
Author: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed Jul 29 15:04:04 2009 -0700
Commit: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed Jul 29 19:10:35 2009 -0700
cgroups: fix pid namespace bug
And it will definitely have a different hash in linux-next, -stable,
distro trees, etc.
So the conventional way of referring to a commit within a changelog is
096b7fe012d66ed55e98bc8022405ede0cc80e96 ("cgroups: fix pid namespace bug")
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
