On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Matt Helsley<matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:13:59PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Li Zefan<lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > As you said, the 2 patches differ just in using different var/func >> > names, so rebasing shouldn't be hard but maybe a bit boring. >> > >> >> Yes - it's a fair amount of work for no real gain. > > So this revert won't introduce a regression for any potential tests? > Yes, there would be a two-commit window where a hypothetical test that tests for concurrent opens of "tasks" files from different pid namespaces would fail. If that was really a big deal, then it wouldn't be too hard to fold the first three patches in this series down into one, but that would reduce the clarity of the commit history. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
