Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): >> This should work around the compile issues that Nathan >> pointed out yesterday. It's too bad that 'select' is >> such a blunt object. We could surely use a soft select >> or something. But this hacks around it a bit. >> >> Create a separate "*_NS_DEP" Kconfig option for the >> dependencies for each namespace. Make the real config >> option and the c/r 'select' bot dependent on the new >> common one. >> >> This should at least keep compile errors from being >> introduced. Whether this is rude or not is a separate >> questions. :) > > Yeah I'm not sure I'm a fan of this... > > While I hate chasing down missing dependencies, maybe > CONFIG_CHECKPOINT should just depend on all the namespaces > instead of selecting them? > Current c/r can work without namespaces - it should not depend on CONFIG_NAMESPACE (though it can suggest). Oren. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
