Bharata B Rao wrote: >> So the groups with guarantees get a priority boost. That's not a good >> side effect. >> > > That happens only in the presence of idle cycles when other groups [with or > without guarantees] have nothing useful to do. So how would that matter > since there is nothing else to run anyway ? > If there are three groups, each running a cpu hog, and they have (say) guarantees of 10%, 10%, and 0%, then they should each get 33% of the cpu, not biased towards the groups with the guarantee. If I want to change the weights, I'll alter their priority. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
