On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 07:40:16PM -0400, jamal wrote: > On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 21:55 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > But then, there could be "tc filter replace" with only this > > (n->nlmsg_type == RTM_NEWTFILTER && (n->nlmsg_flags&(NLM_F_CREATE))) > > which can't get here with a newly created tp, I guess. > > Right - because in that case tp would already exist and would > be found in the lookup. But how about that (of course extremely rude) case "tc filter replace" is run with a new prio? Thanks, Jarek P. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
