Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 10:42 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 19:23 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote: > > > > From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Add "start" argument, to request to map vDSO to a specific place, > > > > and fail the operation if not. > > > > > > > > This is useful for restart(2) to ensure that memory layout is restore > > > > exactly as needed. > > > > > > This needs to go up at the start of the series. It can get merged > > > before everything else. > > > > It does, but now we are sending Oren mixed signals. > > > > I thought we were talking yesterday on irc about Oren doing append-only > > git tree from now on, and someone else (you? :) was going to do patch > > integration and sorting and prettifying? > > I was going to just go and start doing these, but I figured I'd have a > run through the patches first. I probably also shouldn't be doing > anything to which Oren (or anyone else) has really strong objections. > So, I'll give everyone a chance to discuss and object before I go > screwing the patches up. ;) True, part of this may be able to go up on its own. In that case 1. please put the part of my s390 fix patch which applies to this patch in 2. as I asked when Alexey posted this, can we remove the first argument to arch_setup_additional_pages()? Noone uses it. thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
