>> BTW, I don't know how to submit a "useful" patch to kernel community. Or,
>> maybe the patch is not useful at all and maybe has been developed by other
>> developers. I very appreciate if both of experts could give me some
>> commend.
>> I will continue to develop cgroup-related codes to make contribution to
>> kernel
>> development.
>
> I am not sure I understand what you mean by "useful", but it seems you did
> an interesting feature. All the documentation related to submitting patches
> is in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, I hope that helps.
>
I learn from some kernel developers that they said only useful patches will be
accepted by community and applied on next kernel mainstream version.
So, I don't know whether or not my patch can be seen as "useful" by
most of users while it is developed under my project requirements.
> send your patches to lkml@ prefixed with [RFC] in the subject ('quilt' is
> your friend). If the functionality already exists, someone will tell you.
>
mmh... SubmittingPatches said patches should be sent to
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx if there is not "MAINTAINERS file",
after fixed into standard style. what are different with that
you have said? The " lkml@ prefixed " seems not be mentioned
in SubmittingPatches, what should I do?
Thank you very much,
Anqin
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
