anqin wrote: >>> BTW, I don't know how to submit a "useful" patch to kernel community. Or, >>> maybe the patch is not useful at all and maybe has been developed by other >>> developers. I very appreciate if both of experts could give me some >>> commend. >>> I will continue to develop cgroup-related codes to make contribution to >>> kernel >>> development. >> I am not sure I understand what you mean by "useful", but it seems you did >> an interesting feature. All the documentation related to submitting patches >> is in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, I hope that helps. >> > > I learn from some kernel developers that they said only useful patches will be > accepted by community and applied on next kernel mainstream version. > So, I don't know whether or not my patch can be seen as "useful" by > most of users while it is developed under my project requirements. > > >> send your patches to lkml@ prefixed with [RFC] in the subject ('quilt' is >> your friend). If the functionality already exists, someone will tell you. >> > > mmh... SubmittingPatches said patches should be sent to > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx if there is not "MAINTAINERS file", > after fixed into standard style. what are different with that > you have said? The " lkml@ prefixed " seems not be mentioned > in SubmittingPatches, what should I do? lkml@ = linux kernel mailing list aka linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I think you will find the answers of all your questions here: http://kernelnewbies.org/UpstreamMerge If you are looking for the recipients of your patches, IMO you should send: To: Paul Menage Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx cf MAINTENERS file: CONTROL GROUPS (CGROUPS) P: Paul Menage M: menage@xxxxxxxxxx L: containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx S: Maintained Regards -- Daniel _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers