Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes: > i dont see the point of the complexity you are advocating. 99.9% of > the users run a unique PID space. I'm not advocating complexity. I'm advocating using the same APIs as the rest of the kernel, for doing the same functions. > Tracing is about keeping stuff simple. On containers we could also > trace the namespace ID (is there an easy ID for the namespace, as an > easy extension to the very nice PID concept that Unix introduced > decades ago?) and be done with it. I don't really care about the pid namespace in this context. I am just asking that we compare a different field in the task struct. I am asking that we don't accumulate new users of an old crufty bug prone API, for no good reason. I'm asking that we don't be different for no good reason. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
