Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> >> > > I'm speechless too. I'm a bit tired so probably am pushing to hard. At the same time I don't see a single reason not to use struct pid for what it was designed for. Identifying tasks. pid_t's really only belong at the border. I can see in the tracer when grabbing numbers you might not be able to follow pointers. For that I see justification for using task->pid. For the comparison I just don't see it. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
