Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Friday 2008-09-05 08:25, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>>> I hope so :) A different possiblity suggest by Pablo some time ago >>>> would be to mark untracked packets in skb->nfctinfo and not >>>> attach a conntrack at all. >>> Indeed, I remember that :). I left that patch of the table time ago [1]. >>> There's a nf_reset call missing as Patrick said at that time. I can >>> recover it if you like the idea. >> I think that would be a good idea. > > Would that work? Right now, a ct==NULL indicates the 'INVALID' state, > and overloading it with 'UNTRACKED' does not seem nice. ct == NULL would indicate either untracked or invalid. For the cases where it makes a difference, ctinfo has to be checked additionally. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
