Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 2008-09-05 08:25, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> > I hope so :) A different possiblity suggest by Pablo some time ago
>> > would be to mark untracked packets in skb->nfctinfo and not
>> > attach a conntrack at all.
>> 
>> Indeed, I remember that :). I left that patch of the table time ago [1].
>> There's a nf_reset call missing as Patrick said at that time. I can
>> recover it if you like the idea.
>
> I think that would be a good idea.

Would that work? Right now, a ct==NULL indicates the 'INVALID' state,
and overloading it with 'UNTRACKED' does not seem nice.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux