Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > Dave, Serge: > > I'm currently away so I must keep this short. I think we have so far > more discussion than an actual problem. I'm happy to coordinate with > every interested party to eventually see this work go into main stream. > > My only concerns are twofold: first, to get more feedback I believe we > need to get the code a bit more usable; including FDs is an excellent > way to actually do that. That will add significant value to the patch. > I think it's important to demonstrate how shared resources and multiple > processes are handled. FDs demonstrate the former (with a fixed version > of the recent patchset - I will post soon). The latter will increase > the size of the patchset significantly, so perhaps can indeed wait for > now. > > It should not be hard for me to add functionality on top of a more > basic patchset. Excellent. Having two trees or branches, one very basic and nigh-upon useless, with another advanced enough to be a valuable proof of concept to answer "oh yeah, well how will you do (X)?", will work out best. > The question is, what is "basic" ? Yes that is a very good question :) > Anyway, I will be > back towards the end of the week. Let's try to discuss this over IRC > then (e.g. Friday afternoon ?). Sounds great. (I may be taking the day off to paint, but will try to monitor irc) thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers