On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:48 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:34 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > (Or, is that too much effort required on your part to try and > > > cherrypick bits of Oren's changes back into your tree?) > > > > That would probably work as long as Oren is working on top of what I > > have. It's going to be a lot harder if I have to repeat the same > > break-out process for each iteration of Oren's patches, though. > > > > If Oren's purpose is not quite to create a upstreamable patchset, > then it would make more sense for him to keep a git tree and > put new patches on top of his existing ones (within reaason as he > rebases). Then you'd at least be able to trivially look at the latest > deltas. The trick would be compromising on things that I, for instance, think need to be rewritten or removed. Oren would have to rebase his work against what I do. I guess you could think about it like me being upstream from Oren. Anything that I would change, Oren would need to rebase on top of. Oren, are you willing to keep a set of patches that add functionality on top of a minimal set that I'm keeping? Mine being the set that we're trying to push into mainline as soon as possible. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
