sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hmm, so, single and multi-mount don't coexist ? i.e some are multi-mounts > while others are single-mounts. > > The way I looked at is that even if a distro has not yet updated the > startup script (fstab), we could use the multi-mount. Maybe a container > startup script could change /dev/ptmx to symlink and both types of > mounts can work simultaneously. > > Would that be unnecessary ? > Yes, that's unncessary; you can still use a "newinstance" elsewhere in the system (in a container) where you rather by definition don't have a backward compatibility issue. -hpa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
