sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I had the new ptmx node only in 'multi-mount' mode initially. But if users > want the multi-mount semantics, /dev/ptmx must be a symlink. If its a symlink, > we break in the single-mount case (which does not have the ptmx node and > we don't support mknod in pts). > True, but changing that is still a configuration change (adding newns to the fstab); it's not that much more work to change whatever else needs to change. I personally don't expect a whole lot of back-and-forth; I suspect people will switch from the legacy model to the newns model mostly as part of a distro upgrade. >>> I'm open to being convinced and the >>> other problems with that code are more pressing. > > Yes, I will look at the latest in linux-next and the ->driver_data > approach. > > But just to confirm, we do want try and keep single-mount semantics. Certainly for several years at least. -hpa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
