H. Peter Anvin wrote: > sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> I don't like the name "newmnt" for the option; it is not just another >>> mount, but a whole new instance of the pty space. >> I agree. Its mostly a place-holder for now. How about newns or newptsns ? >> > > I suggest "newinstance", but "newns" works, too. Could we also use this mount option to 'unshare' a new posix message queue namespace ? C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
