sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> I don't like the name "newmnt" for the option; it is not just another >> mount, but a whole new instance of the pty space. > > I agree. Its mostly a place-holder for now. How about newns or newptsns ? > I suggest "newinstance", but "newns" works, too. >> I observe you didn't incorporate my feedback with regards to get_node(). > > Yes, I have not addressed it yet. Will look into it in the next pass, > but will add to the todo list now. OK. -hpa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
