On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 11:56 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 10:50 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> The classic challenge is that we really need most of the patches to go > >> through other maintainers because they are not for subsystems we > >> maintain. So I am fairly certain things like our network namespace > >> work will show up in linux-next because they show up in net-next-2.6. > > > > But, there are things like the mqueue patches that are against areas > > that really have no maintainers. Do you think there will be many more > > like that? > > Probably. We are touching parts of the kernel that rarely change. Would having something that feeds into linux-next help make some of this easier? -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
