"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): >> We've been basically merging containers patches through Andrew and -mm >> for a while now. It seems that some of the testing is starting to move >> toward linux-next. >> >> Has anyone considered what it would take for us to get a tree pulled >> into there? > > I'd guess we would need to: > > 1. Beg Stephen :) > 2. Work with the lkml community to decide which patches are > sufficiently agreed-upon at least in principle to go into > linux-next. I really think Eric's netns/sysfs patchset > belongs there. I'd also like to see the freezer container > patchset. > 3. Pick someone to be maintain that tree. Ideally someone > whom everyone here can agree upon. I think Andrew said he intends to get most of -mm into linux-next as soon in the next release cycle. So this may not be a long term problem. The classic challenge is that we really need most of the patches to go through other maintainers because they are not for subsystems we maintain. So I am fairly certain things like our network namespace work will show up in linux-next because they show up in net-next-2.6. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
