On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, Paul, do you have any more objections to the patch? If no, I will > prepare the set for Andrew, all the more so, I noticed, that there's > no ability to reset the failcounter, which is required and can be easily > implemented with the triggers. > No objections to the implementation, other than not being sure that the name is the best one. But since no-one else seems to have opinions either way, I'm fine with going with the name "trigger". Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
