On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If the patch with max_usage for res_counter will be accepted we'll have > two :) files, that a event-triggers essentially, i.e. they don't care > what the user actually write to then, but are interested in the writing > by its own. > > So the proposal is to make cgroups infrastructure handle this case. This could be useful, but in the case of force_empty don't we lose the ability to report an error (EBUSY?) in the event that the cgroup still has tasks? Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
