On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The change that you're referring to is allowing a cgroup to have a > > total memory limit for itself and all its children, and then giving > > that cgroup's children separate memory limits within that overall > > limit? > > Yup. Isn't this reasonable? Yes, sounds like a good plan. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers