Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >>> Todo: >>> - rebase new kernel, and split into some patches. >>> - Merge with memory subsystem (if it would be better), or >>> remove dependency on CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_CONT if possible >>> (needs to make page_cgroup more generic one). >> Merge is a must IMHO. I can hardly imagine a situation in which >> someone would need these two separately. > > Strongly agree. Nobody's interested in swap as such: it's just > secondary memory, where RAM is primary memory. People want to > control memory as the sum of the two; and I expect they may also > want to control primary memory (all that the current memcg does) > within that. I wonder if such nesting of limits fits easily > into cgroups or will be problematic. This nesting would affect the res_couter abstraction, not the cgroup infrastructure. Current design of resource counters doesn't allow for such thing, but the extension is a couple-of-lines patch :) > Hugh > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
