Paul Menage wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > You said the set of files belong to cgroup itself is likely to increase >> > - do you have some candidates in mind? >> >> Nothing concrete right now. One example that I already proposed was >> the "cgroup.api" file but that's shelved for now, until such time as I >> actually propose the binary API that it was intended to help support. >> > > One likely new file that people agreed a while ago could be useful > would be a "procs" file, similar to "tasks", but acting (and > reporting) on thread groups rather than individual tasks. > > Paul Yes, I remember this. This feature would be extremely useful. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
