On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > You said the set of files belong to cgroup itself is likely to increase > > - do you have some candidates in mind? > > Nothing concrete right now. One example that I already proposed was > the "cgroup.api" file but that's shelved for now, until such time as I > actually propose the binary API that it was intended to help support. > One likely new file that people agreed a while ago could be useful would be a "procs" file, similar to "tasks", but acting (and reporting) on thread groups rather than individual tasks. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
