On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:24:16 -0600 "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting Cedric Le Goater (legoater@xxxxxxx): > > From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > We have at least 2 patchsets requiring each a new clone flag and there it > > is, we've reached the limit, none are left. > > This patch uses the CLONE_DETACHED flag (unused) as a marker to extend the > > Are we pretty sure that there is no legacy software out there which has > continued to specify CLONE_DETACHED since the kernel ignores it? Please see -mm's clone-prepare-to-recycle-clone_detached-and-clone_stopped.patch That patch has been cut back to only recycle CLONE_STOPPED because there indeed was software out there which is setting CLONE_DETACHED. See http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2007-11/msg04293.html _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
