[PATCH 2/2] extend clone_flags using parent_tidptr argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxxxx>

We have at least 2 patchsets requiring each a new clone flag and there it is, we've reached the limit, none are left. This patch uses the CLONE_DETACHED flag (unused) as a marker to extend the clone flags through the parent_tidptr argument.

Initially, we thought on using the last bit but it has recently been taken by CLONE_IO.

Obviously, this hack doesn't work for unshare() for which I don't see any other solution than to add a new syscall : long sys_unshare64(unsigned long clone_flags_high, unsigned long clone_flags_low);



Is this the right path to extend the clone flags ? should we add a clone64() rather than hack the extending clone() ?
Thanks for any comments !

C.

Signed-off-by: Cedric Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/sched.h |    1 +
kernel/fork.c         |   14 +++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: 2.6.24-mm1/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- 2.6.24-mm1.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ 2.6.24-mm1/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#define CLONE_NEWPID		0x20000000	/* New pid namespace */
#define CLONE_NEWNET		0x40000000	/* New network namespace */
#define CLONE_IO		0x80000000	/* Clone io context */
+#define CLONE_EXTFLAGS		CLONE_DETACHED	/* use parent_tidptr as an extended set of flags */

/*
 * Scheduling policies
Index: 2.6.24-mm1/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.24-mm1.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ 2.6.24-mm1/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1012,6 +1012,14 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
	struct task_struct *p;
	int cgroup_callbacks_done = 0;

+	/*
+	 * It is not permitted to specify both CLONE_EXTFLAGS and
+	 * CLONE_PARENT_SETTID
+	 */
+	if ((clone_flags & (CLONE_EXTFLAGS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID)) ==
+	    (CLONE_EXTFLAGS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
	if ((clone_flags & (CLONE_NEWNS|CLONE_FS)) == (CLONE_NEWNS|CLONE_FS))
		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

@@ -1455,6 +1463,7 @@ long do_fork(unsigned long clone_flags,
	struct task_struct *p;
	int trace = 0;
	long nr;
+	u64 clone_flags64 = clone_flags;

	/*
	 * We hope to recycle these flags after 2.6.26
@@ -1479,7 +1488,10 @@ long do_fork(unsigned long clone_flags,
			clone_flags |= CLONE_PTRACE;
	}

-	p = copy_process(clone_flags, stack_start, regs, stack_size,
+	if (clone_flags & CLONE_EXTFLAGS)
+		clone_flags64 = ((u64) (uintptr_t) parent_tidptr << 32) | clone_flags;
+
+	p = copy_process(clone_flags64, stack_start, regs, stack_size,
			child_tidptr, NULL);
	/*
	 * Do this prior waking up the new thread - the thread pointer
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux