Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@xxxxxxxxxx): > >> Why is that a conflict w.r.t resource management, isn't that more of a >> cgroup >> feature - task migration. We need task migration for resource management, >> but >> task migration is a system administrator/management function. I don't see >> the >> conflict, but may be I am missing something very obvious. > > This is something we may want to dig. from a checkpoint/restart POV, a > 'container' acts a whole and you don't want tasks to be migrated from a > container to another. They have to share the same container properties. > it might be possible to solve that issue from user space or by making sure > a set of cgroups are dedicated to a container. This is certainly a good topic for the mini-summit. The simple answer of course is you create a container for the virtual server, then create containers within those around the applications you want to checkpoint. But depending on logistics (i.e. per-container swapfiles) this could get complicated. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
