Why is that a conflict w.r.t resource management, isn't that more of a cgroup feature - task migration. We need task migration for resource management, but task migration is a system administrator/management function. I don't see the conflict, but may be I am missing something very obvious.
This is something we may want to dig. from a checkpoint/restart POV, a 'container' acts a whole and you don't want tasks to be migrated from a container to another. They have to share the same container properties. it might be possible to solve that issue from user space or by making sure a set of cgroups are dedicated to a container.
C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
