Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@xxxxxxxxxx): > Dave Hansen wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 11:25 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > >> Hmm. I have an idea how to make this w/o a new system call. This might > >> look wierd, but. Why not stopple the last bit with a CLONE_NEWCLONE and > >> consider the parent_tidptr/child_tidptr in this case as the pointer to > >> an array of extra arguments/flargs? > > > > I guess that does keep us from having to add an _actual_ system call. > > Exactly! I'll be honest, while it's a really neat idea, in terms of code actually going into tree I far far prefer a real new syscall. But it sounds like I'm the only one so I'll just mention it once and then bite my tongue :) thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers