Re: Namespaces exhausted CLONE_XXX bits problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 11:25 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Hmm. I have an idea how to make this w/o a new system call. This might
>> look wierd, but. Why not stopple the last bit with a CLONE_NEWCLONE and
>> consider the parent_tidptr/child_tidptr in this case as the pointer to 
>> an array of extra arguments/flargs?
> 
> I guess that does keep us from having to add an _actual_ system call.

Exactly!

> Do we make the array something like
> 
> 	array[] = { orig_tidptr, nr_flags, actual flags... };

Not exactly. I have already sent my view of this in 
another letter.

> ?
> 
> -- Dave
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux