Re: [PATCH] memory.min_usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory.min_usage
From: yamamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:58:54 +0900 (JST)
Cc: containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, minoura@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xemul@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:46:15 +0900" <20071204164615.fc871e44.kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> But even with seqlock, we'll have to disable irq.

for writers, sure.
readers don't need to disable irq.

YAMAMOTO Takashi
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] memory.min_usage (seqlock for res_counter)
  - From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

References:
- Re: [PATCH] memory.min_usage
  - From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] memory.min_usage
Next by Date: [PATCH 2.6.25] net: netns compilation speedup
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] memory.min_usage
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] memory.min_usage (seqlock for res_counter)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Cgroups] [Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux