Re: [PATCH] memory.min_usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:27:53 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I thought of that when I wrote hi/low watermark patches.
> But I didn't try....
> Hmm, but maybe worth trying.
> 
But even with seqlock, we'll have to disable irq.
And maybe my current high/low patch needs smp_rmb().

I'll consider a bit more.

Thanks,
-Kame

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux