> > > +/*
> > > + * For batching....mem_cgroup_charge_statistics()(see below).
> > > + */
> > > +static inline void mem_cgroup_stat_add(struct mem_cgroup_stat *stat,
> > > + enum mem_cgroup_stat_index idx, int val)
> > > +{
> > > + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > > + stat->cpustat[cpu].count[idx] += val;
> > > +}
> >
> > i think the function name should be something which implies batching.
> >
> Hm, How about this ?
> ==
> mem_cgroup_stat_add_atomic()
> ==
> and add this
> ==
> VM_BUG_ON(preempt_count() == 0)
> ==
_atomic sounds like a different thing to me. _nonpreemptible?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
