sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx writes: > Cedric Le Goater [clg@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > | > I think you and Eric (and I) are disagreeing about those limitations. > | > You take it for granted that a sibling pidns is off limits for signals. > | > But the signal wasn't sent using a pid, but using a file (in SIGIO > | > case). So since the fs was shared, the signal should be sent. An > | > event happened, and the receiver wants to know about it. > | > | seen that way I agree. > | > | si_code is set to SI_MESGQ, but what do we put in si_pid ? 0 ? > | > | we could use the si_errno to pass extra info, like the sending process > | lives in a // world ... > > Does the receiver need to know that sender is in a // world ? What is a // world ? Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
