On 10/1/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > >> Could we make the user interface similar to the one in the memory > >> controller please! It would make it easier for users to configure > >> and control both. > > > > Do you mean by merging the similar code or by making them look like > > the same? If the second, than can you point at least one difference > > except for "usage" vs "usage_in_bytes" (and similar) naming? > > > > I meant similar naming, it makes it is easier if the naming convention > is the same. > I agree with this, but I'd rather see standardization on "limit/usage" rather than "limit_in_bytes/usage_in_bytes". Then the same API can be used for subsystems that use resource counters for things that can't be measured in bytes, e.g. number of tasks. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
