On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:38:10AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > By definition any container (about to be renamed control group) > subsystem is some kind of "controller" so that bit seems a bit > redundant. > > Any reason not to just call it "cpu" or "cpu_sched" Done (in the latest patch I sent a while back)! -- Regards, vatsa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
