On 9/10/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is. > By definition any container (about to be renamed control group) subsystem is some kind of "controller" so that bit seems a bit redundant. Any reason not to just call it "cpu" or "cpu_sched" Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
