Paul Menage wrote: > On 9/3/07, Cedric Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> http://download.openvz.org/~xemul/minisummit.odp >> > > I notice ?s against "Task scheduler" and "Network scheduler". > > Is "Task scheduler" meant to represent "CPU scheduler" or "task count > limit". If the former, CFS in the mainline should provide a lot of > what we need, and has already been linked with task containers by > Srivatsa Vaddagiri. Yes, task scheduler is the CPU scheduler. > Network scheduling is already fairly advanced in Linux - all we need > is a way to be able to feed container information into existing Linux > traffic control concepts. We've played with an approach that lets us > tag a container with a particular id, and then use that id as the > primary classifier in a standard HTB controller, and it seems to be > fairly successful. > > Paul > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
