On 9/3/07, Cedric Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > http://download.openvz.org/~xemul/minisummit.odp > I notice ?s against "Task scheduler" and "Network scheduler". Is "Task scheduler" meant to represent "CPU scheduler" or "task count limit". If the former, CFS in the mainline should provide a lot of what we need, and has already been linked with task containers by Srivatsa Vaddagiri. Network scheduling is already fairly advanced in Linux - all we need is a way to be able to feed container information into existing Linux traffic control concepts. We've played with an approach that lets us tag a container with a particular id, and then use that id as the primary classifier in a standard HTB controller, and it seems to be fairly successful. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers