Hello Pavel ! Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@xxxxxxxxxx): >>> sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> Pavel, >>>> unshare() of pid ns seems to fail with -EINVAL in 2.6.23-rc3-mm1. >>>> I thought we supported it in the earlier patchsets. I guess >>>> I missed that in the review of recent patchsets. >>> I disabled unsharing of pid namespaces because it's almost >>> impossible. Look - you have to reattach all the pids to the >>> task with saving its ids as seen in previous namespaces. >> We agree, but thought you for some perverse reason preferred unshare to >> clone for pidns :) > > I did that in my first version of patches, but then realized > that such problem (the need in reattaching pids) makes the > unsharing ugly. > > BTW, unsharing of a pid namespace is a valid operation, so I > think I will enable it in the nearest future. I have some > thought on how to make such a reattach ;) that would be also very useful to 'enter' such a namespace. BTW, did you take a look at the sys_hijack() serge sent ? Thanks, C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
